2009/3/28 Tim Nash <thedag...@gmail.com> > I get your point, I just don't agree with it. It is often easier to just > install plone than it is to: > 1. search and discover LocalFS > 2. decide if it is too old or if it can be satisfactorily patched. > 3. patch it (thank you Robert) > 4. test, test and test it. > 5. Hope that it still works in the next version of zope that comes out. > 6. plan to test, test and test it in the next version of zope. And the > next, and on and on. > > Or you can install plone and know that it has been well tested, it is well > maintained and has a large community. One click and you are done. The next > version of plone will also be well tested. > > Look, you can do it anyway you want but if you want to imply that my > suggestion to use Plone is 'insane' you need to come up with a better > alternative than LocalFS. > > But of course this is all moot. For most installs the best way to use large > javascript libraries is to put it into an apache folder. >
Installing Plone in such a case is only the solution if one has no better idea about doing things. The Filesystem Directory View functionality is available out-of-the-box through CMF (which is much smaller than Plone). There was also something like SkinnedFolder (I think) implementing are similar functionality. -aj
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
