Review: Needs Fixing I don't understand what ZORBA_WITH_FOP means at all. I'm not really a fan of having flags to enable functionality anyway, at least not in non-core module packages - if the user took the time to download the package, presumably they want the contents, so why force them to add another CMake flag to enable it?
But with this change, ZORBA_WITH_FOP is completely meaningless, because it's now SET(ON FORCE). It will always be ON. So the IF(ZORBA_WITH_FOP) is pointless. I would suggest eliminating the flag entirely. If we really think we need a way to build the data-formatting module without FOP, have a ZORBA_SUPPRESS_FOP flag instead that skips the whole file. Cezar: Rodolfo had a comment about the nested IF thing - apparently IF(EXISTS a AND EXISTS b...) doesn't work, possibly a CMake bug. I haven't verified that bug myself, but it wouldn't surprise me; I've certainly seen other situations where IF(... AND ...) doesn't do what I'd expect in CMake. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug955040/+merge/98891 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba/data-formatting-module. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
