Sounds good to me. I'll add your account when at my computer.

On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, 06:48 Rzepa, Henry S, <h.rz...@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:

> I am happy for you to go ahead!
>
> Thanks.
>
> Henry Rzepa
>
> On 17 Dec 2019, at 02:04, Oliver Stueker <oliver.stue...@mun.ca> wrote:
>
> 
>
> This email from oliver.stue...@mun.ca originates from outside Imperial.
> Do not click on links and attachments unless you recognise the sender. If
> you trust the sender, add them to your safe senders list
> <https://spam.ic.ac.uk/SpamConsole/Senders.aspx> to disable email
> stamping for this address.
>
>
> Dear All (especially Egon and Henry),
>
> I'd really like to hear your opinion (in favor or against) adding these
> WWMM and CML source-code repositories to  https://github.com/BlueObelisk.
>
> If you agree that BlueObelisk is a suitable destination, someone (Egon?)
> would need to add my GitHub account (ostueker) to that GH-organization, so
> that I can create the repos.
> If you have concerns about adding this to BlueObelisk, please let me know
> and I'll simply create a new GH-organization (how about WWMolecularMatrix
> or ChemicalMarkupLanguage ?).
>
>
> Cheers,
> Oliver
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 2:40 AM Peter Murray-Rust <pm...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Many thanks Oliver,
>> Copying Mark Williamson
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 8:01 PM Oliver Stueker <oliver.stue...@mun.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Henry, Egon and Blue Obelisk team,
>>>
>>>
>> I'd first like to thank Oliver for the several years that he has forked
>> and maintained JUMBO-converters software in the context of
>> https://retrievium.com/ . Oliver was on this project which develops
>> computational chemistry tools and has a CML component. I has used
>> JUMBO-converters in the past and may do again.
>>
>> Oliver is now in Newfoundland, Canada and no longer in chemistry but has
>> generously offered to help this migration. He knows more about the details
>> of this than I.
>>
>> His JUMBO fork has taken place since my last commits (which will have
>> been  about 2013 - with minor additional features in 2017 (Scala).
>>
>>
>>> Today Peter (Murray-Rust) and I had a conversation about the future of
>>> the source-code repositories of the WWMM and CML (XML-CML.org) projects.
>>>
>> ...
>>
>> Makes complete sense. I use only Github at present.
>>
>>>
>>> Peter and I have agreed that we want to transfer all of the repositories
>>> (which include projects like oscar4, JUMBO, the JUMBO-converters, the CML
>>> schema and dictionaries) over into a new "Organization" on GitHub which
>>> would then allow to grant merge privileges or even transfer ownership in
>>> case a new "Doctor Who" wants to take on development.
>>>
>>
>> Absolutely. I am very happy to hand over to a new Doctor Who - including
>> Oliver if he wishes - and also to take his current forks if there are no
>> other developments in the last few years that conflict with Oliver's fork.
>>
>>>
>>> Peter suggested that the "Blue Obelisk" might be a good place for the
>>> repositories and I see that https://github.com/BlueObelisk already
>>> exists and contain the code for the Blue Obelisk website and  Blue Obelisk
>>> Data Repository.
>>>
>>>
>> Makes sense - we have suffered from having to migrate at verious times
>> and keep services running and Github looks like a one-stop shop.
>>
>> We would like to get your feedback on a number of points:
>>>
>>>    - Do you also think that https://github.com/BlueObelisk would be a
>>>    good home for the WWMM and CML repositories?  The names wwmm and cml are
>>>    already taken on GitHub.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> I think the names may belong to me and I may have forgotten passwords .
>>
>>>
>>>    -
>>>    - With https://github.com/BlueObelisk already containing data,
>>>    should we create "Teams" within the "BlueObelisk-org" to  keep things 
>>> tidy
>>>    and manage access?
>>>
>>> I don't think I ised teamns on BB. What is the virtue if the numbers are
>> small?
>>
>>>
>>>    -
>>>    - Should we at some point migrate the xml-cml.org website to be
>>>    hosted directly out of the Git-repository?
>>>    This would allow publishing updates simply by merging Pull Requests.
>>>    Who runs the current website (and manages the xml-cml.org domain)?
>>>    Henry?
>>>
>>> I'd be happy to work on migrating the repositories from Bitbucket (hg)
>>> to GitHub (git) over the holidays and even try using GitHub Actions or
>>> Travis-CI for building for some select repositories.
>>>
>>> What are your thoughts?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Peter and Oliver
>>>
>>> <https://bitbucket.org/blog/sunsetting-mercurial-support-in-bitbucket>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> From 2014 to 2016, our team at Memorial University has expanded the
>>>> JUMBO-converters as well as a few CML-CompChem dictionaries, however so far
>>>> we fell short at contributing our changes back to the original projects.
>>>>
>>>
>> Ideally dictionaries shiudl be centrally maintained but I suspect this
>> has been patchy.
>>
>>>
>>>> Now with the risk of all the work being lost when Bitbucket pulls the
>>>> plug on Mercurial, it's time to take action.
>>>>
>>>> The first course of action from my side will be to create Pull-Requests
>>>> containing our work done in the JUMBO-converters and xml-cml.org
>>>> repositories, because it will be much harder to merge them after the
>>>> Mercurial-repositories have been moved elsewhere or converted to Git.
>>>>
>>>
>> Agreed
>>
>>>
>>>> Next is the question of what will happen to all the Mercurial
>>>> repositories at https://bitbucket.org/wwmm/ and
>>>> https://bitbucket.org/cml/ ?
>>>>
>>>>    - Do all repositories need to be migrated?
>>>>    I think I've counted 50 repositories but I have no idea how many of
>>>>    them contain data that has later-on been combined into other 
>>>> repositories.
>>>>
>>>> It depends on the effort. it may be harder to work out what to migrate
>> than actually to migrate it. But I can try to annotate.
>>
>>>
>>>>    - Should they be converted to Git and re-uploaded to BitBucket?
>>>>    As I understand, data about issues and pull-requests will likely
>>>>    get lost during the process.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think this matters from my side.  I don't think we have many
>> issues that are active?
>>
>>>
>>>>    - Wikis are repositories as well and can/need to be converted from
>>>>    Mercurial to Git  as well.
>>>>    It might be possible to export and re-import the issues though.
>>>>    - Maybe move to another hosting site?  GitHub? GitLab?
>>>>    Unfortunately https://github.com/wwmm and https://github.com/cml
>>>>    are already taken.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't have absolute objections to Github (I know some people do)
>>
>>
>>> I'm happy to pitch in and work on migrating *some* of the repositories.
>>>>
>>>> As I had been working with Git quite a lot before my work on
>>>> JUMBO-converters, I have been using the git-remote-gh plugin
>>>> <https://github.com/felipec/git-remote-hg> the whole time.  This
>>>> allows you to use the Git command line tools to work on hg repositories
>>>> transparently.
>>>>
>>>>
>> Thank you.
>> P.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> "I always retain copyright in my papers, and nothing in any contract I
>> sign with any publisher will override that fact. You should do the same".
>>
>> Peter Murray-Rust
>> Reader Emeritus in Molecular Informatics
>> Unilever Centre, Dept. Of Chemistry
>> University of Cambridge
>> CB2 1EW, UK
>> +44-1223-763069
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
>> Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
>>
>
>
> --
> Oliver Stueker, Dr.rer.nat. - Computational Research Consultant
> Memorial University of Newfoundland -  ACENET -  Compute Canada
> Email: supp...@ace-net.ca            Web: http://www.ace-net.ca
> Phone: +1 (709) 864-3021                         Office: HH2033
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
> Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss

Reply via email to