hi neil,

by number of receiver channels, i presume you mean number of antennas?
are these single or dual polarization?

how many spectral channels do you need in your correlator ?

for a large number of spectral channels,
you'll likely want to use an FX architecture correlator (not XF).
in an FX correlator the number of ADC bits doesn't change the FPGA
utilization for the DSP very much.

one fun thing you can do with a 1 bit correlator, is use the LVDS
differential inputs on the FPGA as 1 Gsps digitizers.   on a large FPGA
with a lot of pins you can get about 512 ADC's
(256 antennas, dual pol) built into the FPGA, so the FPGA can be your
digitizer and your correlator...

if you only need a small number of spectral channels, you could build an
XF correlator
with ~512 inputs...  (~256 antennas, dual pol, or ~512 antennas single pol)
in a large FPGA.

with an XF architecture, the FPGA utilization is  J  x
number_of_spectral_channels.
for FX, the utilization goes as K  x  log_base_2(spectral_channels).

but constant K >> constant J,
so sometimes (rarely) it is better to use XF, depending on the number of
spectral channels.


best wishes,

dan



On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 11:47 AM salmon.na via casper@lists.berkeley.edu <
casper@lists.berkeley.edu> wrote:

> For a paper on non-radioastronomy aperture synthesis technology I need to
> know how many receiver channels can run into an almost top of the range
> FPGA optimally designed single-bit cross-correlator running a 2 Gbps. So
> each receiver is digitised (sine and cosine) in single bits 1 Gbps. I’m
> wondering if there are scaling laws for this and I only need to have a ball
> park figure, ie a precision of say a factor of three or thereabouts. Any
> associate papers related to that which might have clues to the capabilities
> would be helpful.
>
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Neil Salmon
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "
> casper@lists.berkeley.edu" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to casper+unsubscr...@lists.berkeley.edu.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/005601da14d7%24ede171b0%24c9a45510%24%40tiscali.co.uk
> <https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/005601da14d7%24ede171b0%24c9a45510%24%40tiscali.co.uk?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"casper@lists.berkeley.edu" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to casper+unsubscr...@lists.berkeley.edu.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/CAGHS_vEdvQAJ9Q5-JOAS1QfJ%3DW8AfQMU9D48cnt_gQ56GA%3DqiA%40mail.gmail.com.
  • [casper] state ... salmon.na via casper@lists.berkeley.edu
    • RE: [EXTER... 'Hawkins, David W (US 334B)' via casper@lists.berkeley.edu
    • Re: [caspe... Dan Werthimer
      • Re: [c... Dan Werthimer
      • RE: [c... salmon.na via casper@lists.berkeley.edu
        • RE... salmon.na via casper@lists.berkeley.edu
        • Re... Dan Werthimer
          • ... salmon.na via casper@lists.berkeley.edu
            • ... Dan Werthimer
              • ... 'salmon.na' via casper@lists.berkeley.edu
              • ... salmon.na via casper@lists.berkeley.edu
                • ... Dan Werthimer
                • ... 'Jonathan Weintroub' via casper@lists.berkeley.edu

Reply via email to