> On Jul 29, 2020, at 4:28 AM, Antonio Carlini via cctalk > <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > ... > For those of you with hobbyist licence PAKs, I presume that pakgen.c will > work on all versions that VSI doesn't support. I know it's frowned on but > it's not really different to running PDP-11 software is it (as that is/was > generally not licenced). Not licensed? What about the Mentec hobbyist license? That's pretty broad and clear. paul
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Zane Healy via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Zane Healy via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Camiel Vanderhoeven via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Jason Howe via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Camiel Vanderhoeven via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License John H. Reinhardt via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Antonio Carlini via cctalk
- RE: OpenVMS Community License Dave Wade via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Antonio Carlini via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Antonio Carlini via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Antonio Carlini via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Michael Kerpan via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License geneb via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Kevin Lee via cctalk
- Re: OpenVMS Community License Bill Gunshannon via cctalk