On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:14:45PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > But what about the future, and what about it being specifically for > > POSIX-SHM? > Tell us... Do you have reasons to believe that we will be forced to > remove /dev/shm/ in the future?
If in the future glibc decides to choose some other implementation for shm_open(), then it has no reason to stay. > > /run doesn't especially /need/ to be a tmpfs fs does it? It could It does not have much sense if it is not a tmpfs, since we already have /var/run. Gabog -- --------------------------------------------------------- MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences --------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]