On Dec 19, Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If in the future glibc decides to choose some other implementation > for shm_open(), then it has no reason to stay. But it has no reason to go away either, since there are many other uses too for a tmpfs.
> > > /run doesn't especially /need/ to be a tmpfs fs does it? It could > It does not have much sense if it is not a tmpfs, since we already have > /var/run. I understand that some people want a writeable file system available before / is mounted rw. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
