Hi,

Am 07.03.24 um 20:33 schrieb Eric Valette:
On 07/03/2024 19:58, Rene Engelhard wrote:

> My point also was  that your reopening of the bug is wrong since the maintainer can't do anything about it.
E.g. if libreoffice wasn't rebuilt against most t64 r-deps since it a) also has libraries needing the rename which I b) did when the transition starts c) had a new release anyway. If that did't happen and LO wasn't rebuilt for the t64 libraries it now needs I'd have reacted the same way as for the bug you reopened. Can't do anything about that, the binNMUs will happen somwehen when ready.


And you probably need to get out of your amd64 bubble, see below

My "bubble" probably represent in volume 99% of debian users/installations so that is a big bubble!
True. My laptop also is one (but incidentially runs stable as main system until the freeze when it will start running testing. rinse and repeat). I personally have a sid only in said sid VM.
I admit that unstable installation volume is far less than stable but the proportion of people using unstable on arm/xxx is probably identical as stable.

I don't think so, actually.  It's probably lesser on sid for arm than the stable vs. unstable ratio of amd64. But it doesn't really matter anyway. arm* is release architectures and so need to get the rebuilds anyway at some time.
I completely can understand that the RT doesn't do those bin-NMUs per arch (when?) but just when it's actually ready.

Well well, you annoy 99% of unstable debian users.

unstable is unstable. Don't use it if you can't handle stuff like this. And yes, be it even for more days or however it takes.


Regards,


Rene

Reply via email to