On 2020-04-14 13:49, Neil McGovern wrote: > I suspect the API should be stable enough for this, if people wanted to > store discussions in a form that isn't discourse itself.
Is the API stable in general, or only this particular function? I ask in the context of #956705: "ITP: python-pydiscourse -- Python library for working with Discourse". Upstream says: > * Provide functional parity with the Discourse API, for the > currently supported version of Discourse (something of a > moving target) > > The order here is important. The Discourse API is itself > poorly documented Maybe the README is just outdated.
