On 11/30/19 8:58 AM, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> I think the right fix would be to compile the package twice as "foo"
> (for the systemd version) and "foo-non-systemd".
>
> Another option would be to ship both versions in package "foo" and
> decide at runtime which one to run, if technically feasible.
>
> My understanding of D.7 is that, If someone provides a patch that
> implements either of this in a maintainable fashion, this patch should
> be accepted.
I'm wondering what the security team says to this approach. Who is
actually going to review these changes, given the fact that most of the
features in systemd that need patches in packages are somehow security
relevant.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
