On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 05:18:35PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 11/29/19 11:32 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: > > Imagine that we have a program that has compile time support for systemd > > and for other mechanisms. It provides enhanced functionality when built > > against systemd, but when so built, it cannot run without systemd. > > > Is this a real life case (if so, please name the package...), or just a > pure fictional one, just because you love debating? >
Or a hypothetical one, but one which could be fairly reasonable to expect. This GR seems to be trying to put in place a statement on what exactly we mean by support, and so considering things which may reasonably happen in the future is something that we should do. I don't find your phrasing as a binary choice useful, and ascribing motives to Sam seems disingenuous. Neil --
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
