On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net>wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:01:09 -0400 > Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net> wrote: > > > > > Just a note, > > > > > > > > > On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: > > > > > >> On 10/19/2013 7:26 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net > > >>> <mailto: g...@gknw.net>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I'd like to first rid the 1.5 traditional Windows build of the > > >>> Release9x & Debug9x targets. Anyone against this? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> no concerns here; is there code that can get deleted too? > > >>> > > >> > > >> probably, I would assume so, I haven't ran it down that far yet. > > >> > > > > > > I did not do this after all nor do I think I am brave enough to. > > > > > > apr_escape, testescape and gen_test_char were added into the build > > > with r1534053. > > > .mak/.dep files were added in r1534516. > > > > > > We should be ready to go on the Windows side now. > > So, given that 1.5 remains compatible with 1.4... but projects which > build APR themselves will have to adapt to the new gen_test_char or > we need to make the suggested change, let's just take the httpd example. > > Does it make more sense for httpd 2.2 Makefile.win to detect the > presence of gen_test_char and build it when encountered, or does it make > more sense to compile-link-invoke gen_test_char.c? I'm happy to make > the respective change later tonight or tomorrow, based on consensus. > > Is the Windows build interface of apr 1.5.x different such that httpd's Makefile.win would care? httpd itself doesn't use apr escape and shouldn't care that apr happens to have a build utility of the same name as one of its own (or something is borked). -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
