Just to verify what I should be testing - and - is it too late to get
something added for packaging?
I assume that for httpd-2.4.X that should build with only apr-1.5.X
(preferred), or with apr-1.4.some-minimum + apr-util-1.5.X
What I would like to add is the buildaix scripts - similar to what I did
for httpd, or at a minimum, the layout.AIX.
As apr has compiler dependancies (if you change complier you must rebuild
apr) I would prefer to have the build script that changes the package name
dependent on the compiler.
A nice start would be the AIX layout.
michael@x054:[/data/prj/apache/apr/apr-1.5.x-save]jsvn diff config.layout
Index: config.layout
===================================================================
--- config.layout (revision 1536612)
+++ config.layout (working copy)
@@ -229,3 +229,26 @@
infodir: ${exec_prefix}/share/info
libsuffix: -${APR_MAJOR_VERSION}
</Layout>
+
+# AIX layout
+<Layout AIX>
+ prefix: /opt
+ exec_prefix: /opt
+ datadir: /var/apr
+ localstatedir: /var
+ sysconfdir: ${localstatedir}/apr/etc
+ mandir: /usr/share/man
+ bindir: ${exec_prefix}/bin
+ sbindir: ${exec_prefix}/sbin
+ includedir: ${exec_prefix}/include
+ libdir: ${exec_prefix}/lib
+ libexecdir: ${exec_prefix}/libexec
+ errordir: ${datadir}/error
+ iconsdir: ${datadir}/icons
+ htdocsdir: ${datadir}/htdocs
+ manualdir: ${datadir}/manual
+ runtimedir: ${localstatedir}/run
+ logfiledir: ${localstatedir}/logs
+ proxycachedir: ${localstatedir}/proxy
+ installbuilddir: ${localstatedir}/build
+</Layout>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
<wr...@rowe-clan.net>wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:58:45 -0400
> Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> > <wr...@rowe-clan.net>wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:01:09 -0400
> > > Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Just a note,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On 10/19/2013 7:26 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net
> > > > >>> <mailto: g...@gknw.net>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I'd like to first rid the 1.5 traditional Windows build
> > > > >>> of the Release9x & Debug9x targets. Anyone against this?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> no concerns here; is there code that can get deleted too?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> probably, I would assume so, I haven't ran it down that far
> > > > >> yet.
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > I did not do this after all nor do I think I am brave enough to.
> > > > >
> > > > > apr_escape, testescape and gen_test_char were added into the
> > > > > build with r1534053.
> > > > > .mak/.dep files were added in r1534516.
> > > > >
> > > > > We should be ready to go on the Windows side now.
> > >
> > > So, given that 1.5 remains compatible with 1.4... but projects which
> > > build APR themselves will have to adapt to the new gen_test_char or
> > > we need to make the suggested change, let's just take the httpd
> > > example.
> > >
> > > Does it make more sense for httpd 2.2 Makefile.win to detect the
> > > presence of gen_test_char and build it when encountered, or does it
> > > make more sense to compile-link-invoke gen_test_char.c? I'm happy
> > > to make the respective change later tonight or tomorrow, based on
> > > consensus.
> > >
> > >
> > Is the Windows build interface of apr 1.5.x different such that
> > httpd's Makefile.win would care?
> >
> > httpd itself doesn't use apr escape and shouldn't care that apr
> > happens to have a build utility of the same name as one of its own
> > (or something is borked).
>
> The httpd 2.2 Makefile.win build invokes the pcre, expat, apr, apr-iconv
> and apr-util builds project-by-project, it doesn't use any corresponding
> top-level build mechanics. This was one aspect that was greatly improved
> by moving to the httpd-2.4 model.
>
> If httpd doesn't pre-build gen_test_char before apr.mak, then the apr
> build will fail, unless we nest the new gen_test_char pre-build.
>
> I think the better solution for a one-source file, source generation
> app is to embed that build into the [lib]apr.dsp/mak files for now.
> But as an alternative, we can teach httpd 2.2 Makefile.win to anticipate
> this requirement if that project is present. That would mean that 1.5
> apr wouldn't build with older httpd 2.2 releases, only the next release
> onwards.
>
>
