Regarding the output path issue, that is just a bug.  It will be fixed in 
0.0.2.  If the app ran, then you have successfully seen FlexJS cross-compile 
and run MXML and AS without Flash.  If you want, you can try the release 
candidate of the Installer 3.1 to install a FlexJS nightly build of 0.0.2

Regarding skill sets, FlexJS needs all kinds of help from all kinds of people.  
We need more documentation and examples.  We need more components.  We need 
tests and testers.  Any little contribution helps and will eventually add up.

I will do my best to work with anyone who has time and energy to contribute.  
And the list of components to be built will be biased toward those who will 
actually use them.  For example, Peter and I were discussing today what the 
next component should be that he writes.  If someone was actively trying to get 
a project up and running and said, hey, I need a ColorPicker, or I need to 
disable a button, we'd either try to teach you how to write that code or write 
that code for you.

-Alex

From: V Chandrasekhar <shake...@yahoo.com<mailto:shake...@yahoo.com>>
Reply-To: V Chandrasekhar <shake...@yahoo.com<mailto:shake...@yahoo.com>>
Date: Monday, June 16, 2014 1:46 PM
To: aharui <aha...@adobe.com<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>>, 
"dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>" 
<dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
Cc: Greg Galbreath 
<greg.galbre...@procure.com<mailto:greg.galbre...@procure.com>>
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Close, But Still Some Problems

Today's discussions have definitely been very helpful. Let me digest all that.

[What kind of skill set is needed to work on FlexJS? If I can have a mentor 
working with me, I will consider working on this, once I complete a course I am 
scheduled to take starting next week.]

Let me move from the sublime to the mundane.

I think that, with our users, we can require that they will have Flash. And we 
don't have an IE requirement.

In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34258,  Paulo Esgaio says:

Encoutered the follwing problems (all solved):

2. It trys to create a folder in the same path as output swf files with the 
same name as the swf filename.
"C:\APACHE\htdocs\testing\bin-release\testing.swf\bin\js-release\"
Removing the swf file and creating the folder manually solves it.

I am running into the above problem. Let me describe in Paulo's terms. I 
deleted testing.swf and manually created a bin\js-release and a bin\js-debug in 
C:\APACHE\htdocs\testing\. (In other words, C:\APACHE\htdocs\testing\ contained 
a bin which contained a js-release and a js-debug.) When I ran the FalconJX 
tool, nothing got created in the folders I manually created. JS files were 
created under C:\APACHE\htdocs\testing\bin-release\testing.swf\bin\js-debug. I 
wonder what part of Paulo's instructions above that I am not doing right.

The index file did run correctly.

________________________________
From: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>>
To: V Chandrasekhar <shake...@yahoo.com<mailto:shake...@yahoo.com>>; 
"dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>" 
<dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
Cc: Greg Galbreath 
<greg.galbre...@procure.com<mailto:greg.galbre...@procure.com>>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Close, But Still Some Problems

If you can control the decision of whether your users will have Flash, I expect 
Flash to be available for several more years.

FlexJS is intended to be insurance, but keep in mind that Apache is essentially 
staffed by volunteers.  Without more folks working on it, the rate at which 
FlexJS will grow to be able to handle more and more of the Flex SDK's 
capabilities will be slower, so the cost of that insurance should really be 
paid for by its potential users, either by collecting money to pay contractors 
to work on it, or by allowing folks like you to contribute to it.  Adobe will 
probably pay Peter and I to work on it for a couple more years, but I don't 
think we can re-code a significant portion of the Flex SDK by ourselves.  So 
getting folks involved is the best way to ensure that FlexJS will be there when 
you need it.  It doesn't have to be a huge commitment, even an hour or two a 
week from enough folks will add up to something.

Regarding AMF, it is possible to create an AMF implementation in JS on newer 
browsers.  IE8 for sure won't have easy support for AMF.  So, if you don't have 
an IE8 requirement, you are a candidate for AMF, but consider this:  even if we 
"can" get AMF to work in JS, the JS implementation may not be faster than JSON. 
 So, depending on what advantages you were getting from AMF, you might still 
want to take a look creating JSON equivalents for your services.

HTH,
-Alex

From: V Chandrasekhar <shake...@yahoo.com<mailto:shake...@yahoo.com>>
Reply-To: V Chandrasekhar <shake...@yahoo.com<mailto:shake...@yahoo.com>>
Date: Monday, June 16, 2014 12:04 PM
To: aharui <aha...@adobe.com<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>>, 
"dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>" 
<dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
Cc: Greg Galbreath 
<greg.galbre...@procure.com<mailto:greg.galbre...@procure.com>>
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Close, But Still Some Problems

Thanks a lot for all your help. I have made a lot of progress in a

We are not in a hurry to migrate immediately to FlexJS at all. FlexJS is an 
insurance for us, in case Flash goes away (which I hope won't happen in the 
next several years). We want to tell our potential customers what kind of Flex 
future-proofing is available to set their minds at ease.

I have some time at the moment to see how big an effort it is for us to convert 
to flexjs. I am sure that day to day work will start pressing soon. I will come 
back to flexjs in two or three months again to get a better estimate of our 
porting effect -- in other words, I see it as an iterative process. And I can 
thank folks enough for the help I am getting.

By the way, I was trying to listen to the YouTube video Alex's talk at Flex 
360. Given my hearing especially, the sound quality was hard for me to 
understand. One of my colleagues was asking about AMF in particular. Perhaps 
the link below talks about it. If not, I am wondering you could let me know 
about the plans for it in FlexJS. AMF is a key part of our apps -- one user 
updates the database on the server and the server pushes out the changes to all 
the users including the one who made the update; AMF is involved in this 
process.



________________________________
From: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>>
To: V Chandrasekhar <shake...@yahoo.com<mailto:shake...@yahoo.com>>; 
"dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>" 
<dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Close, But Still Some Problems

FlexJS in an 'alpha' level technology.  That's why its version number is 
something like 0.0.1 or 0.0.2.  As such, it won't have every feature of the 
current FlexSDK, and may never have every feature as some features will be 
nearly impossible to make work efficiently in JavaScript, especially in IE8.

It might be worth your while to read up on some of the other wiki articles on 
FlexJS.  Start here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/FlexJS

Basically FlexJS is not a magic bullet that will take an existing Flex app and 
make it run without Flash.  It is not intending to emulate Flash in the 
browser.  Instead, it  is a new framework designed to run well in JS.  It 
should have most, but not all, of the major concepts from Flex (states, 
binding, mxml).  But you will have to do some work to get an existing app to 
run.

So, create a test project without DCD support to try to get DataBindingTest to 
run.  And yes, you will need to use the new UI widgets for now.

-Alex



From: V Chandrasekhar <shake...@yahoo.com<mailto:shake...@yahoo.com>>
Reply-To: V Chandrasekhar <shake...@yahoo.com<mailto:shake...@yahoo.com>>
Date: Monday, June 16, 2014 10:55 AM
To: aharui <aha...@adobe.com<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>>, 
"dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>" 
<dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Close, But Still Some Problems

My java version is 1.7.0_55.

I changed mxmlc.bat to specify c:\PROGRA~2\java\jre7\bin\java.exe as the fully 
qualified name of java.exe. I get the following error when I run the FalconJX 
tool:

command line
configuration variable 'compiler.library-path' value contains unknown token 
'DCD_LIB_LOCATION'.
-------------------------------------
Onto another topic, I am trying an existing app to run with FlexJS. I get 
"s:ButtonBar is not defined error". Is this a case of ButtonBar having to be 
replaced with another control?

Thanks for helping me make progress on this effort of using FlexJS.

________________________________
From: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>>
To: V Chandrasekhar <shake...@yahoo.com<mailto:shake...@yahoo.com>>; 
"dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>" 
<dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Close, But Still Some Problems

Run java –version from the console to make sure you have a recent enough Java 7.

Also see the comments in the bug FLEX-34258.  To run the launch config, you may 
need to specify the path to java7.

-Alex

From: V Chandrasekhar <shake...@yahoo.com<mailto:shake...@yahoo.com>>
Reply-To: V Chandrasekhar <shake...@yahoo.com<mailto:shake...@yahoo.com>>
Date: Monday, June 16, 2014 9:56 AM
To: aharui <aha...@adobe.com<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>>, 
"dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>" 
<dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Close, But Still Some Problems

> Almost there!

Agree. Thanks for your help. I am excited about "future-proofing" our apps.

> As I suggested in one of my responses, if you have
problems, please see:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34258

I have been working with the above.

DataBindingTest is a Web application. I copied the mxmlc.bat from FLEX-34258. I 
do have Java Version 7.

I am getting the following error which is different from what Andrew Flach 
reported:

java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: 
org/apache/flex/compiler/clients/MXMLJSC : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClassCond(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source)
at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(Unknown Source)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(Unknown Source)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
Could not find the main class: org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLJSC. 
Program will exit.
Exception in thread "main"
________________________________
From: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>>
To: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>" 
<dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>; V Chandrasekhar 
<shake...@yahoo.com<mailto:shake...@yahoo.com>>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Problems Importing Configurations

Almost there!  As I suggested in one of my responses, if you have
problems, please see:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34258

-Alex

On 6/16/14 8:42 AM, "V Chandrasekhar" 
<shake...@yahoo.com.INVALID<mailto:shake...@yahoo.com.INVALID>> wrote:

>I don't know how to add this to my existing thread, when I email instead
>of using Nabble.
>
>I am trying to follow the instructions in
>
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Using+FlexJS+with+Adobe+F
>lash+Builder, specifically
>
>Once you have your app working as a SWF, try the FalconJX tool in the Run
>menu.
>
>
>Is this the FalconJX Debug and Release Build tool?
>
>I get the following error when I run this tool:
>
>using FlashBuilder Project Files
>FlashBuilder settings:
>    -locale
>    en_US
>    -source-path+=C:\Users\shaker.chandrasekhar\Adobe Flash Builder
>4.7\DataBindingTest/src
>    -compiler.accessible=true
>    -output=C:\Users\shaker.chandrasekhar\Adobe Flash Builder
>4.7\DataBindingTest/bin-release/DataBindingTest.swf
>    -library-path+=C:\Users\shaker.chandrasekhar\Adobe Flash Builder
>4.7\DataBindingTest/libs
>    -js-output-type=FLEXJS
>    -sdk-js-lib=c:\FlexJS\js\bin\..\..\frameworks\js\FlexJS\src
>    -fb
>    C:\Users\shaker.chandrasekhar\Adobe Flash Builder
>4.7\DataBindingTest/src/DataBindingTest.mxml
>
>command line
>Error: unknown configuration variable 'js-output-type'.
>
>Thanks.








Reply via email to