On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:13PM, Dood@ODDO wrote: > That's the million dollar question - I think we should approach the > Arrow people and get a conversation going. We want to be ahead of > the curve, not behind it - Arrow seems to be making quite a stir, > not to mention that it was fast-tracked to mature project status > apparently solely based on the people/companies involved ;-)
I am afraid you misunderstand the point of the 'fast tracking'. To start with, ASF doesn't case what companies are involved nor there's no such thing as fast tracking. However, there's 'direct to TLP' track, that allows for a community that has enough ASF members and other people, with lengthy involvement into Apache projects, to go directly into TLP. The reason is simple: these people are well versed in Apache Way and the incubation isn't required for me. So, please stop using this 'fast-tracked' confusion. Cos P.S. Another point: TLP != 'mature project status'. Please educate yourself about the Apache incubation, before making statement like this in the future. > On 2/20/2016 11:14 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > >It sounds to me that it does not store it’s own data, but allows to process > >data from somewhere else, right? If yes, will I be able to take Ignite data > >with Arrow and convert it to a columnar format for some other processing? > > > >On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Roman Shtykh <rsht...@yahoo.com.invalid> > >wrote: > > > >>It's a standard (including format and algorithms) to share in-memory data > >>between several big data platforms. > >>In my understanding, it is like placing data in in-memory columns in > >>Parquet and being able to use it in Kudu without serializing/deserializing. > >> > >>-Roman > >> >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
