On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 02:02PM, Dood@ODDO wrote:
> On 2/24/2016 1:31 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:13PM, Dood@ODDO wrote:
> >>That's the million dollar question - I think we should approach the
> >>Arrow people and get a conversation going. We want to be ahead of
> >>the curve, not behind it - Arrow seems to be making quite a stir,
> >>not to mention that it was fast-tracked to mature project status
> >>apparently solely based on the people/companies involved ;-)
> >I am afraid you misunderstand the point of the 'fast tracking'. To start 
> >with,
> >ASF doesn't case what companies are involved nor there's no such thing as 
> >fast
> >tracking. However, there's 'direct to TLP' track, that allows for a community
> >that has enough ASF members and other people, with lengthy involvement into
> >Apache projects, to go directly into TLP. The reason is simple: these people
> >are well versed in Apache Way and the incubation isn't required for me.
> >
> >So, please stop using this 'fast-tracked' confusion.
> >   Cos
> >
> >P.S. Another point: TLP != 'mature project status'. Please educate yourself
> >about the Apache incubation, before making statement like this in the future.
> >
> 
> I will educate myself. What you need to do is learn to be polite. I
> am not sure you can teach that though ;(

If you don't mind elaborating on what particularly was impolite in my email, 
you'll
put me forever into your debts. And teach me a lesson of good manners too.

Cos

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to