Hi,
Ying,
I'll stick to the list for discussion. Thanks for your guide! I
re-created a fresh new branch of JENA-491, which did not contain hp
package any more.
Andy,
You mention that the GRAPH grammar needs revisions. Please check the
following ones. I add the short form. Am I missing anything else?
Complete form:
CONSTRUCT {
# Named graph
GRAPH :g { ?s :p ?o }
# Default graph
{ ?s :p ?o }
# Named graph
:g { ?s :p ?o }
# Default graph
?s :p ?o
} WHERE { ... }
Short form:
CONSTRUCT {
} WHERE { ... }
regards,
Qihong
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Ying Jiang <jpz6311...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Qihong,
>
> As Andy mentioned, the bonding period is for community bonding, not
> just mentor bonding. I can help you with JavaCC for the project. But
> much more work needs comments and discussions with others in the
> community. For example, Andy just pointed out the design issue and the
> timeline changes. It's required for you to think about it and make
> revisions accordingly. If any questions, just ask on the mailing list.
> You'll get answers from the right one, not just from me.
>
> It seems that your JENA-491 branch still uses com.hp.hpl.jena. Have
> you re-checked out the latest code?
>
> Best regards,
> Ying Jiang
>
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi Qihong,
>>
>> One of the reasons there is a community bonding period is to create the
>> right social context for the work rather than just being about technical
>> work. As other people may be working on the areas you need to modify, this
>> will help avoid problems.
>>
>> Discussions should be on this list and there has been nothing. Discussions
>> are also here to help you. It's a large codebase, and some of it quite old.
>> It makes it hard to see what's important and what's not.
>>
>> When it comes to decisions, the Apache catchphrase is "if it isn't on the
>> list, it does not exist". Given that the Jena development community only
>> exists via this list, you'll appreciate that this is quite important.
>> Please discuss with Ying about regular (minimum, weekly) on the list.
>>
>> There are some changes to the plan if the javacc work is done first. Alos,
>> we have discussed a revised design with GRAPH inside the CONSTRUCT template.
>> Don't forget the case of CONSTRUCT WHERE { } shorthand form.
>>
>> What does the timeline look like with these revisions? That changes the
>> "Week 1 - Week 3" slot. Some of that freed up time should go to announcing
>> the changes on the users@ list, I suggest just after the mid term
>> evaluation.
>>
>> You will have noticed that the package structure in ARQ has changed. There
>> is no com.hp.hpl.jena anymore, it's all moved under org.apache.jena. You
>> are probably better off starting from a clean clone of Jena.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> On 24/05/15 14:12, Qihong Lin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry for my late response. During the community binding period, I
>>> studied the JavaCC grammar with my mentor's help. Now, I know how to
>>> use JavaCC in this project.
>>> A new branch of JENA-491 [1] has just been set up. I'll code there in
>>> the first place, and finally merge the code into jena master.
>>>
>>> In all, I think everything is ready. Let's begin coding!
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Qihong
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/confidencesun/jena/tree/JENA-491
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 05/05/15 11:52, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 28/04/15 13:09, Ying Jiang wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FYI, Google announced the accepted projects of GSoC 2015 yesterday. A
>>>>>> Jena project of "Extend CONSTRUCT to build quads (JENA-491) [1] is
>>>>>> among them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Ying Jiang
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KiDlfxMq5ZsU7vj7ZDm10yC96OZgdltwmZAZl56sTw0/edit#heading=h.fwbztdn0y3zl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the plan for the bonding period?
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ping?
>>>>
>>>>
>>
