+1
Should be fine to just delete all of them (as long as nobody raised
objections).
Not sure if we could enable some protection GitHub side that disallow to
push into non-existing branches and thus avoids accidental branch creation?
-Matthias
On 3/13/24 11:39 AM, Josep Prat wrote:
Hi Michael,
I think it's a good idea. Only "official" branches should exist in the
upstream repo.
I guess the only exception would be if a massive feature would be done by
different individuals collaborating and they would need a "neutral" place
for the branch to be. But This didn't happen yet and I doubt it will in the
near future.
Best,
---
Josep Prat
Open Source Engineering Director, aivenjosep.p...@aiven.io |
+491715557497 | aiven.io
Aiven Deutschland GmbH
Alexanderufer 3-7, 10117 Berlin
Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024, 19:27 José Armando García Sancio
<jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:02 AM Mickael Maison
<mickael.mai...@gmail.com> wrote:
What do you think?
I agree. I wouldn't be surprised if these branches (not trunk or
release branches) were created by mistake by the committer.
Thanks,
--
-José
