+1 Sounds like a good idea to me.
-Bill On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 2:55 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > Should be fine to just delete all of them (as long as nobody raised > objections). > > Not sure if we could enable some protection GitHub side that disallow to > push into non-existing branches and thus avoids accidental branch creation? > > > -Matthias > > On 3/13/24 11:39 AM, Josep Prat wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > I think it's a good idea. Only "official" branches should exist in the > > upstream repo. > > I guess the only exception would be if a massive feature would be done by > > different individuals collaborating and they would need a "neutral" place > > for the branch to be. But This didn't happen yet and I doubt it will in > the > > near future. > > > > Best, > > > > --- > > Josep Prat > > Open Source Engineering Director, aivenjosep.p...@aiven.io | > > +491715557497 | aiven.io > > Aiven Deutschland GmbH > > Alexanderufer 3-7, 10117 Berlin > > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen > > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024, 19:27 José Armando García Sancio > > <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:02 AM Mickael Maison > >> <mickael.mai...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> What do you think? > >> > >> I agree. I wouldn't be surprised if these branches (not trunk or > >> release branches) were created by mistake by the committer. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -- > >> -José > >> > > >
