When you check the status page [1] you will see that a wiki is no
longer required.
We can skip adding it.

BTW: I added Chenya to the roster that increases the PPMC members not
subscribed to 3 again after it was down to 2.

Wilfred

[1] https://incubator.apache.org/projects/yunikorn.html


On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 13:12, Weiwei Yang <abvclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Sunil
>
> I don’t think we ever have a wiki, do we still need to add that? I see some 
> projects leave that empty as well.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jan 23, 2022, at 2:07 PM, Sunil Govindan <sun...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > @Weiwei Yang <w...@apache.org>
> > Could you please add WIKI as well to this?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sunil
> >
> >> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 1:33 PM Weiwei Yang <w...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you Felix.
> >> I have added the initial podling status file:
> >>
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings/yunikorn.yml
> >> .
> >> Please let me know if that looks good or not.
> >>
> >>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 10:18 PM Sunil Govindan <sun...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I will reach out to them.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Sunil
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 9:00 PM Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Pls add the podling status file
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings/
> >>>>
> >>>> 3 ppmc members have not subscribed to private@
> >>>>
> >>>> These can be found on
> >>>> https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/yunikorn
> >>>>
> >>>> <
> >>>
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings/
> >>>>>
> >>>> ________________________________
> >>>> From: Weiwei Yang <w...@apache.org>
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 10:05:55 PM
> >>>> To: dev@yunikorn.apache.org <dev@yunikorn.apache.org>
> >>>> Cc: priv...@yunikorn.apache.org <priv...@yunikorn.apache.org>
> >>>> Subject: Re: Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) - Community Graduation Vote
> >>>>
> >>>> hi all
> >>>>
> >>>> Most issues under the graduation preparation JIRA YUNIKORN-1005
> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-1005> are fixed.
> >>>> The remaining one is the who-are-we web page, I am currently collecting
> >>>> info for that, should be done by next week.
> >>>> Shall we start to vote now? I can start a new thread for the community
> >>>> voting if nobody has objections.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 11:02 AM Wilfred Spiegelenburg <
> >>>> wilfr...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> None of the security lists mentioned in the security page [1] are
> >>>>> moderated. They are private lists, i.e. not openly available for
> >>>>> browsing in an archive, but not moderated. Using the private@ for
> >>>>> YuniKorn does not seem to line up with what other projects do either.
> >>>>> None of the recently graduated projects mention anything like using
> >>>>> the private@ mailing list on their sites. They all have just used
> >> the
> >>>>> general security link mentioned on their site unless they have a
> >>>>> specific security@ list. YuniKorn would be the one standing out from
> >>>>> what seems to be the norm.
> >>>>> Examples from the last 2 years of graduated projects using a simple
> >>>>> link or a text pointing to [1]: Pinot, Dolphinscheduler, Ratis,
> >>>>> Echarts, Gobblin, TVM, Superset and Datasketches. There are more but
> >> I
> >>>>> think this provides an overview of what is expected on graduation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Wilfred
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/security/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 18:21, Weiwei Yang <w...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Wilfred
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Adding a security@ mailing list sounds like a good idea, but I do
> >>> not
> >>>>> think that is required in the current stage.
> >>>>>> We can do that post-graduate. For now, the Apache security doc said
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We strongly encourage you to report potential security
> >>>> vulnerabilities
> >>>>> to one of our private security mailing lists first, before disclosing
> >>>> them
> >>>>> in a public forum.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I do not see any issue if we use our private@ mailing list for
> >> this
> >>>>> purpose.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:01 PM Wilfred Spiegelenburg <
> >>>>> wilfr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The private@ is a moderated list. This has two issues: a
> >> moderator
> >>>>>>> needs to approve any message not sent by a PMC member. This will
> >>> slow
> >>>>>>> down the process of interaction with the reporter. It would also
> >> not
> >>>>>>> reach the YuniKorn committers group as not all committers are part
> >>> of
> >>>>>>> the PMC. Security issues should be handled and worked on by all
> >>>>>>> committers not just by the PMC members.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The security notification update made to the website I think does
> >>> not
> >>>>>>> line up with the security guidelines referenced in the link
> >> provided
> >>>>>>> in the dropdown menu of the YuniKorn site [1]. In that link there
> >>> is a
> >>>>>>> well defined way to report security issues. If we need to enhance
> >>> and
> >>>>>>> extend what we do we either establish a security@ mailing list
> >> and
> >>>>>>> provide a static page with security related information on our
> >> site
> >>> or
> >>>>>>> we leave it as is. My preference would be to establish a security@
> >>>>>>> list and make all committers a member of that list.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think we need to roll back the website changes part of
> >>> YUNIKORN-1006
> >>>>>>> [2] in PR [3] for the website.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Wilfred
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/security/
> >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-1006
> >>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-yunikorn-site/pull/105
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 04:45, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> For "The project provides a well-documented, secure and private
> >>>>> channel to report security issues, along with a documented way of
> >>>>> responding to them.' the standard that I've seen used is to tell
> >> people
> >>>> to
> >>>>> e-mail private@ when they think they might have a security related
> >>>> issue.
> >>>>> I think that would probably work well for Yunikorn too.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 7:04 AM Chenya Zhang <
> >>>>> chenyazhangche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Weiwei,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for driving this! The evaluation is quite comprehensive
> >>>>> overall. I checked our Apache project maturity guidelines and noticed
> >>> the
> >>>>> below three items. Not sure if we already have them but they are not
> >>>>> blockers to our graduation. We could think more about them along the
> >>> way.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> QU30
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The project provides a well-documented, secure and private
> >>> channel
> >>>>> to report security issues, along with a documented way of responding
> >> to
> >>>>> them.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> QU40
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The project puts a high priority on backwards compatibility and
> >>>> aims
> >>>>> to document any incompatible changes and provide tools and
> >>> documentation
> >>>> to
> >>>>> help users transition to new features.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> CO50
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The project documents how contributors can earn more rights
> >> such
> >>> as
> >>>>> commit access or decision power, and applies these principles
> >>>> consistently.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Chenya
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:00 AM Weiwei Yang <w...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi YuniKorn community and mentors
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Based on the discussion thread [1], after 2 years time of
> >>>>> incubating, it is
> >>>>>>>>>> considered that now is a good time to graduate YuniKorn from
> >> the
> >>>> ASF
> >>>>>>>>>> incubator and become a top-level Apache project. We have
> >>> reviewed
> >>>>> the ASF
> >>>>>>>>>> project maturity model [2] and provided some assessment of the
> >>>>> project's
> >>>>>>>>>> maturity based on the guidelines. Details are included as the
> >>>>> following.
> >>>>>>>>>> Please read this and share your thoughts by replying to this
> >>>> email,
> >>>>> your
> >>>>>>>>>> feedback will be much appreciated!!!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> *Code, License, and Copyright*
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> All code is maintained on github, under Apache 2.0 license. We
> >>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>> reviewed all the dependencies and ensured they do not bring
> >> any
> >>>>> license
> >>>>>>>>>> issues. All the status files, license headers, and copyright
> >> are
> >>>> up
> >>>>> to date.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> *Release*
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The community has released 5 releases in the past 2 years, i.e
> >>>>> v0.8, v0.9,
> >>>>>>>>>> v0.10, v0,11, and v0.12. These releases were done by 5
> >> different
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>> managers [3] and indicate the community can create releases
> >>>>> independently.
> >>>>>>>>>> We have also a well-documented release process, automated
> >> tools
> >>> to
> >>>>> help new
> >>>>>>>>>> release managers with the process.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> *Quality*
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The community has developed a comprehensive CI/CD pipeline as
> >> a
> >>>>> guard of
> >>>>>>>>>> the code quality. The pipeline runs per-commit license check,
> >>>>> code-format
> >>>>>>>>>> check, code-coverage check, UT, and end-to-end tests. All
> >> these
> >>>> are
> >>>>> built
> >>>>>>>>>> as automated github actions, new contributors can easily
> >> trigger
> >>>>> and view
> >>>>>>>>>> results when submitting patches.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> *Community*
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The community has developed an easy-to-read homepage for the
> >>>>> project [4],
> >>>>>>>>>> the website hosts all the materials related to the project
> >>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>> versioned documentation, user docs, developer docs, design
> >> docs,
> >>>>>>>>>> performance docs. It provides the top-level navigation to the
> >>>>> software
> >>>>>>>>>> download page, where links to all our previous releases. It
> >> also
> >>>>> has the
> >>>>>>>>>> pages for the new contributors on-boarding with the project,
> >>> such
> >>>>> as how to
> >>>>>>>>>> join community meetings, events links, etc.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The community shows appreciation to all contributors and
> >>> welcomes
> >>>>> all kinds
> >>>>>>>>>> of contributions (not just for code). We have built an open,
> >>>> diverse
> >>>>>>>>>> community and gathered many people to work together. With
> >> that,
> >>> we
> >>>>> have 41
> >>>>>>>>>> unique code contributors and some non-code contributors as
> >> well.
> >>>>> Many of
> >>>>>>>>>> them have becoming to be committers and PPMC members while
> >>> working
> >>>>> with the
> >>>>>>>>>> community. There were 2 new mentors, 8 new committers, 2 new
> >>> PPMC
> >>>>> from 6
> >>>>>>>>>> different organizations [5] added in the incubating phase. And
> >>> in
> >>>>> total,
> >>>>>>>>>> the project has 6 mentors, 21 PPMC, and 27 committers from at
> >>>> least
> >>>>> 14
> >>>>>>>>>> different organizations. Community collaboration was done in a
> >>>>> wide-public,
> >>>>>>>>>> open manner, we leverage regular bi-weekly/weekly community
> >>>>> meetings for 2
> >>>>>>>>>> different timezones [6] and dev/user slack channels, mailing
> >>> lists
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>> offline discussions.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> *Independence*
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The project was initially donated by Cloudera, but with a
> >>> diverse
> >>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>> source community, it has been operated as an independent
> >> project
> >>>>> since it
> >>>>>>>>>> entered into ASF incubator. The committers and PPMC members
> >> are
> >>> a
> >>>>> group of
> >>>>>>>>>> passionate people from at least 14 different organizations,
> >> such
> >>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>> Alibaba, Apple, Cloudera, Databricks, LinkedIn, Microsoft,
> >>>>> Snowflake, etc.
> >>>>>>>>>> The project's success is not depending on any single entity.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I have enough reasons to believe the project has done
> >>> sustainable
> >>>>>>>>>> development successfully in the Apache way. Again, please
> >> share
> >>>> your
> >>>>>>>>>> thoughts, all YuniKorn contributors, committers, PPMC, and
> >>>> mentors.
> >>>>> Thank
> >>>>>>>>>> you!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/dno411y59g2pcy1d3kd7s3kdjz9jw65n
> >>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [3] https://yunikorn.apache.org/community/download
> >>>>>>>>>> [4] https://yunikorn.apache.org/
> >>>>>>>>>> [5] https://incubator.apache.org/projects/yunikorn.html
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [6]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/165gzC7uhcKc5XDWiMYSRKBiPQBy2tDtXADUPuhGlUa0
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
> >>>>>>>> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.):
> >>>>> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9
> >>>>>>>> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@yunikorn.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@yunikorn.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@yunikorn.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@yunikorn.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@yunikorn.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@yunikorn.apache.org

Reply via email to