Per definition the 

DIGITALRADIO GROUP

is

 
"A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio digital modes, 
applications, software, hardware, equipment, and on the air 
activity."

The ongoing discussion about legal or formal topics since a couple 
of weeks with constant repeating of all the old arguments without 
any new ideas or aspects is more than boring and for sure not in 
line with the original definition. It's just repeating something and 
no interest in carefully considering the other party's arguments. 
And, worst of all, only one part of the different subjects of this 
group, the air activity if this term can be applied at all, is 
discussed over and over again with absolutely no progress. Please 
count the posts on FCC regulations, fundamental (and unfortunately 
non-technical) contributions to emergency communication in 
particular the spending of 250 KUSD for radio equipment etc (I don't 
want to waste my time to list all what I have read in the past weeks 
since I joined this group), and then compare that number to the 
posts on real topics of this group. The ratio between the two 
figures is in my opinion completely inadequate.

I like open discussions but there should be an end sometime, at 
least that the different parties come to the conclusion that there 
will be no agreement. That is at least an agreement.

If the present discussions will continue I will for sure leave this 
group. The group will survive it, of course, but I wonder if not 
many others not commenting in public will look for a better 
alternative to the meeting place the Digitalradio Group is offering 
at the moment. 

73

Juergen, DL8LE



Reply via email to