On Thu 24/May/2018 20:58:30 +0200 John Levine via dmarc-discuss wrote: > In article <445884976.7940.1527153118...@appsuite.open-xchange.com> you write: >>This is actually an area of concern to us: how will small scale operations, >>like a server that only hosts a handful >>of mailing lists for local non profits / open source projects / amateur >>groups etc, be able to be recognized as >>trusted ARC intermediaries? The big players have reputation systems that >>could be used for this as well, but what >>about everyone else? > > People at big providers tell me that they're likely to seed a public > whitelist of ARC forwarders.
Wasn't this tried for SPF already? Assuming, for the sake of argument, that such a whitelist will be ready right after ARC's availability, by that time most mailing lists will have adjusted their From: rewriting so as to work smoothly with DMARC. Hence, by the "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" principle, I see no likely looking mass adoption of ARC+whitelist. What am I missing? Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
