This is where RUF reports are useful. For AUF reports, you are making an assumption of fact not in evidence. I think the more reasonable approach would be o provide a line forlocal policy ovrride (applied) and a line for no local policy override applied. If the reporting period is a day (date) that leaves uncertainty as to when in the reporting period the override occurred but at least you know the percentage/absolute number(s).
Mike On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:26 AM Brotman, Alex via dmarc-discuss < dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > What is to be done if only a portion of the messages from the reporting > period receive a policy override? Perhaps this is done based on IP, or > only applied part way through the day. It seems like in the specification, > the reporting definition assumes the entire set of reported messages has > the override. > > -- > Alex Brotman > Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy > Comcast > > > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
