Yeah, I got a few private replies that stated roughly the same. We do log the policy at evaluation time, but I’ve probably not noticed that someone altered their policy mid-day. And yeah, I agree, it seems like something that if we were going to have some revision to the spec that might be made more clear. Thanks for the responses
-- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast From: Brandon Long <bl...@google.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 8:18 PM To: Brotman, Alex <alex_brot...@comcast.com> Cc: dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dmarc-discuss] PolicyOverride in Reporting Isn't the override in the RowType? So you can just have multiple RecordTypes, each with different RowTypes? Ultimately, it seems like the report is a bunch of fields with a count, and so the composition is to make sure that the set of rows is a "unique" key. Theoretically you should log even the published policy at eval time, so you can report different counts even if the policy changes over that period... even if you'd have to send separate reports. The schema doesn't really make that clear, to my mind, I wouldn't have buried the count. Brandon On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 5:26 AM Brotman, Alex via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org<mailto:dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>> wrote: What is to be done if only a portion of the messages from the reporting period receive a policy override? Perhaps this is done based on IP, or only applied part way through the day. It seems like in the specification, the reporting definition assumes the entire set of reported messages has the override. -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org<mailto:dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!VCzzeZvccB7hTba4qFIhrnWysqr7rxWDS6v3M-fEfg1IFaG4i4QGldWP17K6Wmhw0BOm$> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.dmarc.org/note_well.html__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!VCzzeZvccB7hTba4qFIhrnWysqr7rxWDS6v3M-fEfg1IFaG4i4QGldWP17K6WoKi1GzJ$>)
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
