+1 to what Brandon wrote.

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:23 PM Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss <
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:

> Isn't the override in the RowType?  So you can just have multiple
> RecordTypes, each with different RowTypes?
>
> Ultimately, it seems like the report is a bunch of fields with a count,
> and so the composition is to make sure that the set of rows is a "unique"
> key.  Theoretically you should log even the published policy at eval time,
> so you can report different counts even if the policy changes over that
> period... even if you'd have to send separate reports.
>
> The schema doesn't really make that clear, to my mind, I wouldn't have
> buried the count.
>
> Brandon
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 5:26 AM Brotman, Alex via dmarc-discuss <
> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
>
>> What is to be done if only a portion of the messages from the reporting
>> period receive a policy override?  Perhaps this is done based on IP, or
>> only applied part way through the day.  It seems like in the specification,
>> the reporting definition assumes the entire set of reported messages has
>> the override.
>>
>> --
>> Alex Brotman
>> Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
>> Comcast
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc-discuss mailing list
>> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
>> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>>
>> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
>> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to