In article <caj4xoychidor9q-dy+gixv4kwnakod1imebkdxvwwls9gsb...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:44 PM Blason R via dmarc-discuss < >dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > >> Thanks that makes sense! Assuming they do not have a DKIM facility >> aligning messages with SPF should suffice my need, right? ...
>My question to you is why, in 2020, you would use a 3rd party vendor that >does not properly support DKIM signing and apparently doesn't understand >how DMARC works? A knowledgeable vendor should be able to provide you with >a 1 or 2 page PDF to guide you in how to best implement SPF/DKIM/DMARC. >Just saying. Mike is too polite to say that any mail provider that doesn't already understand DKIM, SPF, and DMARC, has shown that it is astonishingly unfamiliar with the way that mail works and is unlikely to be able to provide adequate service. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
