On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:02 PM Dotzero <dotz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> My overall point is that this thread makes it seem like we're not putting >> forward a complete solution. It feels a lot more like a proposed standard >> that for its clear success depends on a bunch of other things that range >> from experimental to abstract to undefined. And if that's a correct >> summary, I'm asking if that's what we really want to do. It seems a little >> haphazard, like we're scrambling to tie together the loose ends of a movie >> plot. We need to do a good job of bringing our audience to as solid a >> conclusion as possible, or the critics' reviews might not come out well. >> > > My response to your statement "... this thread makes it seem like we're > not putting forward a complete solution." is a complete solution to what? > It seems like people are trying to throw in everything but the kitchen > sink, including new proposals and rehashing old issues that were supposedly > settled, as we go through last call. >
Yes, that's part of what I'm observing. It's possibly a form of scope creep, and indeed "We should stop that" is one valid response. :-) -MSK, p11g
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
