--- Michael Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I'm still holding out for a possible CO2 > sea/ocean/lake as an explanation > for features that we, on our water planet, associate > only with bodies of > water. That doesn't mean that there haven't *also* > been bodies of water on > Mars, just that it doesn't look like the case is > closed yet. Unless I've > missed something. > > -michael turner > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > == > You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing > list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Project information and list (un)subscribe info: > http://klx.com/europa/ > As I understand it, the recent findings by the rovers indicate deposits of gypsum and salt, which dissolve in water, but not in supercritical CO2 ===== Sincerely James McEnanly __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html == You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/
