Mark Rotteveel wrote: >> I also don't like the thematic subdivisioning of the current Scalar >> Functions chapter. It has certain advantages, but they are small >> in my opinion.
> I generally like the subdivision by target datatype: it allows me to > drill down quickly to what I need, while also supporting looking for a > function for say - string manipulation - without knowing its name (or > even its existence) and not getting distracted by functions for other > datatypes. Especially with the growth of functions in Firebird 3 and > Firebird 4, such a sub-division seems a good thing to retain to me. I must admit that the growth of functions is a good argument for keeping the thematic subdivision. > The current list of functions in each section should already be ordered > alphabetically, but I'll double check. Yes, it looks like they are. Cheers, Paul _______________________________________________ Firebird-docs mailing list Firebird-docs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-docs
