I didn´t said that this problem happens only in Firebird. I just asked
if this problem occurs only in Firebird or in any RDBMS, because I
really don´t know.
I searched in Google and found that, for instance, MS suggests not to
install SQL Server in a domain controller, but for security reasons. In
some articles, MS even recommends to disable disk write cache when
installing SQL Server.
I searched information about others RDBMS and generally they recommend
to disable disk write cache to ensure database integrity. This seems
reasonably. That´s why I am surprised about the difference in performance.
Regards
Eduardo
-------- Mensaje original --------
*Asunto: *Re: [firebird-support] Bad performance of Firebird in Windows
Server 2012
*De: *'Carlos H. Cantu' lis...@warmboot.com.br [firebird-support]
<firebird-support@yahoogroups.com>
*Para: *Eduardo guse...@gmail.com [firebird-support]
<firebird-support@yahoogroups.com>
*Fecha: *30/12/2015 21:39
I know, but that's impossible to do on that server. So the only
solution I found so far is to install the application in another computer.
But anyway I would like to understand why this is necessary in
Firebird. It would be great if anybody knows the answers to my
questions of my previous message.
Why do you think the problem only happens with Firebird? Use Google
and you will find documents from Microsoft telling to not install
MSSQL Server in PDC machines. As I said before, any write intensive
application (like RDBMS) will suffer with no cache.
Carlos
www.firebirdnews.org <http://www.firebirdnews.org>-
www.FireBase.com.br <http://www.FireBase.com.br>
---
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de
virus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
