Hey
From what i can read on the internet TempCacheLimit, is per server process, and 
not per attachment.  
http://firebird.1100200.n4.nabble.com/TempCacheLimit-td4309475.html 
http://firebird.1100200.n4.nabble.com/TempCacheLimit-td4309475.html
 https://www.mail-archive.com/firebird-support@yahoogroups.com/msg10199.html 
https://www.mail-archive.com/firebird-support@yahoogroups.com/msg10199.html

 
 

 I believe I have found the statements that caused the problem, first one was 
executede about 400/second and contained a union, that was replaced by union 
all in the hope that would eliminate the need for temp cache. 
 The second statement is a really nasty dynamically build common table 
expression containing upwards of 10 union.. Here we are in the process of 
moving this search to Elastisearch.
 

 We just purchased FB TraceManager at our company to weed performance issues  - 
Thanks for a great product : )

  • [firebird-su... kragh.tho...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
    • Re: [fi... 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
      • [fi... kragh.tho...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
        • ... Thomas Steinmaurer t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
          • ... kragh.tho...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
            • ... Thomas Steinmaurer t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
              • ... kragh.tho...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
                • ... Thomas Steinmaurer t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
                • ... Alexey Kovyazin a...@ib-aid.com [firebird-support]
                • ... kragh.tho...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
                • ... Alexey Kovyazin a...@ib-aid.com [firebird-support]
                • ... 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]

Reply via email to