On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:44:05 +0100 Pav Lucistnik <p...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Greg Larkin píše v so 16. 01. 2010 v 18:02 -0500: > > > Here is the original post: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg227363.html > > I will agree that `portupgrade -o` is way too useful feature. > I'd vote for reverting to the old behaviour. > > > I thought portmgr might have some insight into additional reasons > > for making the change, such as fixing a problem with pointyhat > > builds, etc. At the moment, I'm neutral on the change, since it > > hasn't caused me any grief, but I did some research for the folks > > who posted the original questions. > > It was done because someone thought it is a good idea and submitted a > PR about it. > Howdy, For some ports is the conflict check too late see example here. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gecko/2009-December/000577.html I agree that we need a new pre-fetch hook in bsd.port.mk if a conflict present is. But that need a bit work and it is on my todo list... - Martin _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
