On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:50:21 -0700 (MST) Warren Block <wbl...@wonkity.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, RW wrote: > > > -aRr isn't implied by -a, the rR options are ignored in the former. > > > > I think it's fairly clear that recursing through installed > > packages with consistent dependecies isn't going to find a package > > that isn't in the set of all installed packages. > > That sentence makes me a little dizzy. I think you mean that since > -a is equivalent to listing all packages on the command line, -r or > -R are redundant. > > So portupgrade \* (i.e., -a) is a superset of > > portupgrade -r libexample > > because all the dependencies of libexample are included in the \* and > so portupgrade will see they need to be updated because a port they > depend on has been updated... Right? yes _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
