This seems bizarre. Logically, it would seem better to do a split like
vim (bare vim - what you would expect) and xvim (vim with X11) similar
to how emacs does emacs/xemacs.
On 1/10/2011 4:06 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 22:19:02 +0100, Tony Maserati<ableton...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I'm just curious - what's the point of including X11 as a dependency
to vim? And then making a vim-lite port (which you usually discover
after installing X11). How about making it vim and vim-x11 instead?
Maybe because gvim is really *much* nicer than plain console-based vim
sessions.
The vim-lite port exists for those cases when you really want to install
just plain good ol' vim without all the bells and whistles. You can also
install editors/vim with WITHOUT_X11='true' to avoid the pulling of all
this X11 stuff.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
