On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:02:35 -0500, Ed Smith <abandon.every.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > This seems bizarre. Logically, it would seem better to do a split like > vim (bare vim - what you would expect) and xvim (vim with X11) similar > to how emacs does emacs/xemacs.
XEmacs[1] is not 'Emacs with X11 support', but a very different editor. The main GNU Emacs port (editors/emacs) does include support for X11, and it's actually a lot more pleasant to use under X window. [1] http://xemacs.org/ Its name is certainly slightly confusing now that people have gotten accustomed to all the 'foo' vs. 'xfoo' ports, but the XEmacs editor has been around for a *long* time, so let's not confuse it for something very different from what it is :) _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
