On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Alejandro Imass <aim...@yabarana.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Frank Leonhardt <fra...@fjl.co.uk> wrote: >> On 29/08/2013 09:52, Frank Leonhardt wrote: >>> > > Hi Frank thanks for taking the time to try to replicate this. Here is > all the detailed info > > 8.1-RELEASE > > em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 > > options=209b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC> > ether 00:31:88:bd:b9:3a > inet xxx.yyy.52.74 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast xxx.yyy.52.127 > inet xxx.yyy.52.70 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast xxx.yyy.52.127 > inet xxx.yyy.52.71 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast xxx.yyy.52.127 > inet xxx.yyy.52.73 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast xxx.yyy.52.127 > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>) > status: active > > I use rc.conf standard practice for aliases: > > ifconfig_em0="inet xxx.yyy.52.74 netmask 255.255.255.128 -tso" > ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet xxx.yyy.52.70 netmask 255.255.255.128 -tso" > ifconfig_em0_alias1="inet xxx.yyy.52.71 netmask 255.255.255.128 -tso" > ifconfig_em0_alias2="inet xxx.yyy.52.73 netmask 255.255.255.128 -tso" > > nune# netstat -rn > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > default xxx.yyy.52.1 UGS 168 182183463 em0 > 127.0.0.1 link#4 UH 0 0 lo0 > [... internal aliases to lo0 here...] > xxx.yyy.52.0/25 link#1 U 0 68581 em0 > xxx.yyy.52.70 link#1 UHS 0 14363 lo0 > xxx.yyy.52.71 link#1 UHS 0 64765 lo0 > xxx.yyy.52.73 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 > xxx.yyy.52.74 link#1 UHS 0 29170 lo0 > > Note the Netif Expire on 71,73,74 are showing lo0 could this be the problem? > > nune# ssh -b xxx.yyy.52.71 foo@bar > Password: > >> w -n > 3:15PM up 130 days, 22:30, 3 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > [...] > foo pts/24 xxx.yyy.52.74 3:14PM - w -n > > I don't know why mine is showing 74 and from your example it should be > showing 71. Did you see the article below? > > http://serverfault.com/questions/12285/when-ip-aliasing-how-does-the-os-determine-which-ip-address-will-be-used-as-sour > > This seems to be a pretty common issue or it's just a > miss-configuration problem? > > Thanks! > > Alejandro Imass > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Aliases should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255. What you seeing is not typical behaviour on FreeBSD. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-virtual-hosts.html Patrick _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
