On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Alejandro Imass <aim...@yabarana.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Patrick <gibblert...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Alejandro Imass <aim...@yabarana.com> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Frank Leonhardt <fra...@fjl.co.uk> wrote: >>>> On 29/08/2013 09:52, Frank Leonhardt wrote: >>>>> >>> > > [...] > >> Aliases should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255. What you seeing is >> not typical behaviour on FreeBSD.
[...] > One of you asked about NAT. We are using natd to nat some public ports > to other ports on the private IPs that are aliases of lo0. This is for > the jails that don't have public IPs we just forward some ports to the > jail's ports like this: > > For example: > > redirect_port tcp 192.168.101.123:22 12322 > redirect_port tcp 192.168.101.123:80 12380 > > Could this have an effect on OUTBOUND connections?? Seems unlikely to > me but I think one of you asked about NAT I suspect for a good reason. > > I'll turn off the natting temporarily and test. > I can confirm that the culprit was natd. Now the question becomes why does natd affect the source IP for an outbound connection?? Is there a way to fix it and keep natd? Seems that Patrick's NAT hunch on hist first reply was right on the money. Thanks, -- Alejandro Imass _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"