> I still think that for such cases the number of iterations of the affected > tests should be increased to get more precise values. the times are for single iteration. (chunk median/chunk size) > Please separate this line slightly from the rest of the table > and print the *cumulated timing* (in 's', not 'µs') of all tests, > something like i will asap!
Best, Goksu goksu.in On 29 Aug 2023 22:09 +0300, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>, wrote: > > > here is the results with chris’ suggestion. (thanks chris) > > Much better, thanks! > > > still a bit noise on only load and load_advances. are results > > acceptable? > > As far as I can see, the biggest differences occur if the 'Baseline' > and 'Benchmark' columns contain very small values. I still think that > for such cases the number of iterations of the affected tests should > be increased to get more precise values. Please try that. > > Something else: I think that the 'TOTAL' line doesn't make sense right > now. Please separate this line slightly from the rest of the table > and print the *cumulated timing* (in 's', not 'µs') of all tests, > something like > > Total duration for all tests: 25.3s > > and > > Total duration of tests for 'Roboto_subset.ttf: 3.4s > > > Werner
