On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:39:36 Adam Bolte wrote: > It's probably unlikely, since as it stands I think there is a license the > DFSG considers free but the FSF does not? That would need to be addressed > first to attract such people to make a FSF-free repository. I'm not sure > how this specific issue could be solved. > > I also agree - if there were any possibility of such a FSF-free repository > to be created, it would need to be exclusively FSF-free software, or it > would miss the point. >
FSF-free-only repository is a lovely idea. But it won't be enough to satisfy practical need for non-free drivers and perhaps for some mild cases when for example upstream ship an artwork (images) that nobody can establish an ownership for. Having said that I think it is a good idea to have more than one non-free with different criteria because fsf-free is probably better to keep apart from truly evil non-free like source-less blobs etc. regards, Dmitry. _______________________________________________ Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list Fsf-collab-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/fsf-collab-discuss
