On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com> wrote: > 5. Better cheat sheets are needed. People complain about how cluttered and > overwhelming they are. Just like our online help pages. They're full of > Wikipediababblespeak and not "to the point." > > 6. More guides on how to do events. I have developed checklists and so forth > for people. I know how much Wikimedians hate writing documentation, but > honestly, I know for a fact that Wikipedians in Residency's have started > because of the case study I wrote, I know for a fact GLAMs have done content > donations because of the case studies I write, and I know for a fact that > people have ready the case study I wrote about edit-a-thons and learned from > it and done it. I make powerpoints and post them and encourage people to > reuse them, and they do.
It is also important to automate help. I have not seen much progress along those lines. 'Computing with words' is a mature subject. Best A. Mani A. Mani [Last_Name. First_Name Format] CU, ASL, AMS, ISRS, CLC, CMS HomePage: http://www.logicamani.in Blog: http://logicamani.blogspot.in/ _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
