The depressing thing to me is that the English Wikipedia community takes
all of 10 minutes to work itself into a frenzy about the use of profanity
in a positive, non-personal way, but if an editor on Wikipedia calls a
female editor a cunt, no one dares to bat an eye.

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is it a double standard?  If that page hadn't been written by Keilana,
> would it have been published as is?
>
> Perhaps you're right, it *is* a double standard.  Just not quite the one
> some think it would be.
>
> Risker/Anne
>
> On 21 February 2016 at 08:31, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Op-ed about systemic bias and articles created.  Interesting double
>> standard about profanity in the comment section.
>>
>>
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2016-02-17/Op-ed
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
>> visit:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
> visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to