Sent from my iPad
>> On 30 Apr 2018, at 20:00, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 30 April 2018 at 18:39, Jan Iversen <j...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi >> >> We just received an email that attic-test.git is created, on private, which >> I cannot relay here due to apache policy (which I agree with). >> >> I can however relay my response, what apart from a “thank you” was a call to >> all: >> >> “I must however state that the word “consensus” seems to mean nothing in our >> little community. I remember we have discussed transferring the site to git, >> something I would have done tomorrow based on the positive comments... but >> attic-test, where did that come from.” >> >> I am concerned about people going in different directions, without trying to >> get consensus, what the community wants, that way we will never reach a >> state where we can get a new site online. >> >> PMC members know who made the request in self-service but not who initiated >> it. > > This was proposed and discussed on this list 3 days ago: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/954ae76be44936b2352282a3d04ea7d72ee9d8780bcedf0259770aed@%3Cgeneral.attic.apache.org%3E where do you see the consensus in that thread ? at the very best you can claim I am neutral. And you politely forget I proposed to move attic to git tomorrow: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c204426a53accc9af3a2d35ac9c0a386a094e0500e4e94dc23b7b6e5@%3Cgeneral.attic.apache.org%3E which you agreed to. But lets not prolong this discussion since it does not really matter done is done. This was the last straw in a big stack of hay, and I have made up my mind on what is important to me. rgds jan I > > S.
