I don't think resubmission of a vote is required.  According to
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#ipmc-top-level-recommendation
it's
a consensus vote.  I don't believe it has to be unanimous, I would just
prefer to not be misrepresented.

John

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:54 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Luke,
>
> By my count there was more than one binding -1 raised during the vote and I
> don't think all were changed during subsequent discussion.  At a minimum
> let's post a corrected RESULT, but I believe by ensuring the raised issues
> are satisfactorily resolved and then starting another vote you can achieve
> an unanimously positive outcome, if that is desirable (and of course it is
> (smile)).
>
>
> > On Oct 22, 2015, at 8:24 PM, Luke Han <luke...@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> > The vote for Apache Kylin to become a top-level project has passed
> > with 27 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.
> >
> > Thank you everyone for taking the time to review and cast your vote.
> >
> > We will now prepare a resolution for the next Board meeting.
> >
> > 10 binding:
> > * Henry Saputra
> > * Andrew Purtell
> > * Bertrand Delacretaz
> > * Julian Hyde
> > * P. Taylor Goetz
> > * Ted Dunning
> > * Edward J. Yoon
> > * Alexander Bezzubov
> > * John D. Ament
> > * Owen O'Malley
> >
> > 17 non-binding:
> > * Luke Han
> > * Shaofeng Shi
> > * Jason Zhong
> > * Qianhao Zhou
> > * Dong Li
> > * Droopy Hu
> > * Xiaoyong Bai (lostitle)
> > * Qi Liu (Goroutine)
> > * Yerui Sun
> > * Xu Jiang
> > * Debashis Saha
> > * Yang Li
> > * Chad Chun
> > * Atri Sharma
> > * Hao Chen
> > * Eddy Cai
> > * Naresh Agarwal
> >
> > Luke
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Reply via email to