I think that I am in a somewhat similar position to Mike. My Linux machines happen to be virtual machines that are, for me, test cases for older hardware with modest resources. When I looked into flatpak it appeared that it would use a lot more resources yet would be tricky to set up some functions that involve interfaces for example to external hardware such that I just wasn't ready to make the intellectual investment in learning to use flatpak. Someone would still have to sell me on using flatpak.
On Wed, May 8, 2024, 7:17 PM Adrien Monteleone < adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote: > Any opposition to using flatpak? You wouldn't have to wait. > > Regards, > Adrien > > On 5/8/24 3:18 AM, v....@scottsonline.org.uk wrote: > > That could explain things. Unfortunately, I can't (readily) install 4.13 > > on mint - even the latest mint 21.3 has libraries too old for the deb's > > off the website. But thanks for the info - at least I can look forward > > to the next mint upgrade that should sort things. Meanwhile, I can > > muddle through :-{ > > > > Thanks to you and to Adrien for replying. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.