Hi All, Barbara and I chatted about the discussion in this thread, and here's our summary, please correct us if we've gotten stuff wrong.
- On item 1, work on the security considerations of draft-ietf-homenet-simple-naming will proceed as usual. - On item 2, (the perimeter security draft milestone in our charter), we don't see anyone stepping up right now to do that work, so unless someone does in the next few days, we'll have a chat with our AD about whether or not it makes sense to remove that milestone from the charter, or do something else. We'll report back on that at IETF-101 or before. - On item 3, (profiling HNCP and Babel security stuff for homenet), it seems like folks would like to wait a bit and see how at least the Babel work progresses, and maybe we should have a discussion at IETF-101 about when it makes sense to start work on profiling what gets picked in the Babel WG, for use in homenets, and whether there's any chance of near-term progress on HNCP security mechanisms for homenets. We'll also allocate a slot in our draft agenda for a presentation about anima enrolment (as offered by Michael Richardson, assuming he's still up for doing that:-) to provide some additional background for that discussion. Again, thanks for the discussion so far, and please do correct the above if we've mis-interpreted the sense of the list. Cheers, Barbara and Stephen.
0x7B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
