>>> On 23 Jul 2020, at 18:58, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: >>> >>> This is very cool. >>> Is it written up as a specification somewhere? What is the signal that the >>> device behind is a router, and not a PC? >>> >>> Why isn't homenet standardizing this? >> >> Cause it's architecturally "challenged"? > > The working group or the solution?
Not sure how you could interpret that as pointing to the working group. The solution obviously. IPv4 "pass through" implies sharing the IPv4 address among multiple nodes. Creating all sorts of tricky problems. Which of the nodes gets an ICMP error message for example. Cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
