just one clarification: do we prefer to have a version 25 being published or should we leave it as version 24 ? Yours. Daniel
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 8:11 AM Daniel Migault <mglt.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 7:56 AM Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> > wrote: > >> >> Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyn...@cisco.com> wrote: >> > As the text has changed a lot, not so much on the technical content >> but >> > more or completeness and readability, I will re-submit it to another >> > IESG evaluation early January in the hope that the IESG will approve >> > this draft. >> >> Thank you. >> >> > May I kindly request the authors to fix the idnits issues ? >> > >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-24.txt >> > it is about a reference to RFC 6125 or its -bis and the use of >> > obsoleted RFC 5077. >> >> The text says: >> >> The HNA will validate the DM's control channel certificate by doing >> [RFC6125]/[I-D.ietf-uta-rfc6125bis] DNS-ID check on the name. >> >> The word "an" ought to be in front of [RFC6125]. >> I think that idnits is confused. >> >> I thought the UTA document was just a patch on RFC6125, but I see that >> it's a >> complete replacement, so referencing both makes less sense. >> >> Just removed rfc6125 > >> As for RFC5077. I have replaced it with RFC8446 (TLS1.3), section 4.6.1, >> but >> the reference feels less useful now. >> >> >> -- >> Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting >> ) >> Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Daniel Migault > Ericsson > -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
