Hi Chas, Glad to see that there will be some time spent expanding and refining the Lift documentation, good docs are definitely the sign of a well run project. I am one of those lurkers you speak about, so I thought I'd speak up and give my input.
I would like to see explanations on creating various concepts, useful across many different site types, with a discussion on the how and why they would be implemented the way they are in Lift. This post from David: http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/17e08ec0422721db# which explains both why there is no baked in User concept in Lift and how one would go about creating a User concept is exactly what I mean. If this type of thing was formalized into some documentation I think it would help greatly in understanding Lift. -Chris On Apr 21, 3:38 pm, "Charles F. Munat" <c...@munat.com> wrote: > I am charged with coming up with a site map/information architecture for > our hopefully-soon-to-be-updated wiki. > > What would most benefit you on a documentation wiki? What sorts of > things are you having the most problems with? > > Please submit suggestions for a wiki outline, as well as any other ideas > you have. For example, ideas on wiki structure are welcome. You could > even suggest your own outline. > > Please participate! Yes, you, lurker! We want to know what you need. > > I'll collect all the ideas this weekend, consolidate them, and present a > suggested outline (road map) for the documentation wiki. > > Thanks! > > Yes! If you are reading this, then I am talking to you. Speak up. > > Chas. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
