Honestly I'm kinda shocked that some people are more mad at him for not liking israeli treatment of palestinians than the whole pedophilia thing
what the hell, assess your values jeez On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 8:37 PM Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> wrote: > > From: Omer Zak <w...@zak.co.il> > > Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 20:10:59 +0300 > > > > > And yes, his views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are skewed and > > > sometimes border on the silly, but if you think boycotting us is > > > wrong, then why do you suggest boycotting him? Why is it that a > > > single point of disagreement is enough to call for an ostracism? > > > > I would not boycott him due to his views on the Israeli-Palestinian > > conflict. Not even if he'd advocate for the DS part of BDS. > > My issue with him is that HE BOYCOTTED ISRAELI INSTITUTIONS not > > approved by the Palestinians. He supported, by his actions, the B part > > of BDS. > > If you distinguish between his views and deeds, you don't know RMS. > This is the man who never uses a smartphone, or a Web browser with > JavaScript support, because that could cause him to use non-Free > software. His views and his deeds are inseparable: he acts on his > views immediately and without any compromises. Thus, if some of his > views are incorrect or silly, so will be the deeds. I don't always > agree with his radical approach to these matters, but I admire his > ability to live 110% according to his principles; you won't find many > people capable of that. > > > He chose to boycott. He should bear the consequences of this choice. > > He already have: by refusing to talk in our institutions back then he > was deprived of our attention and our support, and heard some quite > unfriendly remarks, which were well deserved. Now he does want to > talk (or so it seems; I have no knowledge about his purposes except > what I've read here). We should encourage people to reassess their > views, not try "punishing" them out of pure vengeance. > > > I don't think we'll lose by this. > > Your opinion, to which you are entitled. I don't think it's based on > anything substantial, but even if it is, why should you take upon > yourself to decide for others whether they will hear something new and > useful, and might lose by not hearing that? IME, one can usually take > something useful out of hearing a smart person, even if one disagrees > with some of his views. > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-il mailing list > Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il >
_______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
