On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 09:25:24AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:45:02AM +0400, Mike Korbakov wrote: > > Last chance to not mix up the problem. So I see the following problems: > > > > 1. Search engine for the official site. > > Search should be available by simple actions: text entry and one-click (or > > "Enter") > > Search results from the official website should lead to also official > > responses. > > All results on this page > > http://www.google.com/search?q=%22nfs_server%22&domains=www.openbsd.org&sitesearch=www.openbsd.org&btnG=Search > > are located in the domain openbsd.org, their text looks correct. Without > > special knowledge, > > no one can determine their relevance to real life. > > If I had special knowledge, then would not have used the search. > > Someone does not agree? > > Entering 'nfs_server' in the OpenBSD.org main page search *does* > find a spanish version of the FAQ from 2004 which has a single > reference to nfs_server. Unfortunately I can't read spanish so I > don't know what it says. However, as it is from 2004 it is undoubtably > wrong. > > Going to the source tree and doing a "find /usr/src/www -type f | > xargs grep nfs_server" finds four mentions of nfs_server (es, pl, > pt, and zh faq6.html). > > Going into the cvs repository via the web front end shows that > nfs_server got removed in r1.149 of rc.conf in 2011/07/08, as part > of the move to the rc.d framework. > > Going into /etc/rc.conf itself shows some 'backward compatibility' > mentions of nfs_server. Which I guess are not sufficient to make > nfs_server work as you desire. > > It looks to me like it's almost time to remove that backward
This I am all for. > compatibility code and dead language translations of the FAQ, lest > others be misled. I don't really agree with that. The outdated translations are not linked from the main OpenBSD page, I always make sure of it. Of course you can still see them by going directly to the URL but well... -- Antoine
